continued from An Overview of Homeland Security (part I)
How does homeland security all come together?
Homeland Security
exists because of the increasing danger of attacks, accidents and natural disasters in the modern world.
Every action in homeland security may be thought of as contributing to Preparedness for or Response to such incidents. Some experts call
this “Left of Boom” (that is before
the incident), and “Right of Boom”
(after the incident.
·
Preparedness
has three parts:
o
Mitigation
– reducing the impact of an event before it takes place (like moving people out
of a flood zone before a flood begins).
o
Prevention
– impossible for natural disasters but a high priority for counterterrorism,
and thus the subject of major efforts by intelligence and law enforcement.
o
Protection
– the shielding of people and things from the effects of an event if it does
take place.
A good perspective on the various aspects of Preparedness
is provided by the DHS National
Infrastructure Protection Plan.
·
Response
also has three parts:
o
Immediate
Response – life and property saving measures in the
first 72 hours “Right of Boom.”
o
Recovery
– which includes all efforts at every level to return the victims of an event
(whether individuals, business, or government) to their “Left of Boom”
condition.
o
Resilience
– a relatively new concept which emphasizes promoting the ability of
individuals and organizations to anticipate, absorb, adapt to, and rapidly
recover from a disruptive event either on their own or with collaborative
assistance at the lowest possible level.
·
A good perspective on the various aspects
of Response is provided by the DHS National
Response Framework.
The linear nature
of this framework suggests the concepts are linear as well. They are not. Improvements in Preparedness
promote Response, and vice versa. All aspects of this framework are taking
place at all times. (For example, New Orleans may be Recovering from a past
hurricane while actively Preparing for the next.)
And finally, the
whole business of homeland security can be quite expensive in money, time and
opportunity cost. The cost of Preparedness (and by extension, Response) can be
reduced by Risk Management. The cost
of Response (and by extension, Preparedness) can be reduced by Whole of Community Resilience.
What are the remaining challenges?
Now it gets
interesting.
Everything
discussed up until now has been a matter of organizing, employing, and
resourcing capabilities, individuals or agencies. To a citizen, it all looks
like moving boxes and lines on an organizational chart.
But huge hurdles
remain, and they are all related to the human participants – getting people
from different agencies to cross artificial boundaries and work together for
the common good. Training, Education, Management and Leadership are the tools of progress in homeland security – and unfortunately
they have all proven inadequate to the task of truly coordinating efforts up
until now.
If the American
experience demonstrates the power of a single motivating concept over the
history of our nation, it is that of Incentive.
So if there is one concept that deserves top attention as a problem solver in
the field of homeland security, it is creating new incentives for people to
work together within this framework. For future progress in homeland security,
we must promote our Common Defense and General Welfare through new and
imaginative incentives.
To summarize, one way to think
about homeland security is that the types of concerns are not new, but the
scope and scale of those concerns are. And many of the players who prepare for
and respond to these concerns are not new either, but their coordination and capabilities
most certainly are. As a result, our
preparedness and response to domestic security issues is greatly improved, and
by extension, so is our ability to deal with public safety issues as well.
But human nature
being what it is, we must ask “at what
cost” have these improvements been gained? That is the subject for a different
essay and a different day.
And of course, Thinking Enemies really do exist. And they are trying to unravel our improvements in homeland security more rapidly than we are instituting them. Homeland Security can never be "solved." It can only be managed . . . from day to day to day . . ..
No comments:
Post a Comment