See the last entry
in Thinking Enemy for a discussion of how the current anarchy in the Mideast
began. This entry addresses the Syrian mess - - as simply as I can explain it.
Syria
is located Northwest of Iraq, bordering Turkey, with its back to the
Mediterranean. It contains several valuable ports and the routes for the lucrative
movement of oil from countries in the region. Composed
of many factions and religions, it was ruled with a rough hand by the Assad
family starting in 1970. It supported the US with intelligence and other means
during the war against Saddam. The Obama Administration saw a way to advance
their vision of US values by encouraging Assad’s overthrow in the Arab Spring.
Now imagine please . . . the
geographic situation described above as a crossroads in a densely populated
area where seven roads run together, creating seven-pie shaped territories at
6, 8, 10, 12, 2, 3 and 5 o’clock respectively. The seven territorial “pies”
intersect and overlap, each ruled by a gang at war with one or more of the
others. Also every segment contains populations from the other segments, some
only large enough to be victims, but some significant enough to threaten stability
from within.
Gang 6 is fighting gangs 8 and
10, as well as gangs 3 and 5, but they are allied with gang 12, and indifferent
to gang 2.
The 10’s are fighting the 6’s,
but would like a major piece of 8’s territory where many of their relatives
live.
Gang 5 is fighting everybody but
would like to ally with gang 3, except their last emissary was beheaded as an
answer.
The 2’s risk collapse from
attacks by the 3’s, and are allied with the 12’s in response, but domestic
religious and ethnic minorities within 2 fear the alliance with 12 more than
the radical teachings of 3, and invite this most bloodthirsty of gangs in.
You get the picture. Every “pie shaped wedge” has a flexible list
of friends and enemies, with many of their own people dwelling in other
sectors, and many restive people from those other segments threatening domestic
revolt.
In the midst of this multi-sided
gang war with its indistinct boundaries and mixed populations, an outside agent
(the US) weighs in with plans to train and deploy thousands of proxy
fighters. It recruits people who want to
fight 6, but plans to use them only against 3, in an alliance with 2, who by
the way hates them. One of the most respected US generals suggests (no kidding)
maybe we can use 5 to attack 3 inside 2, even though 5 remains at war with us, our
ally 2 and their ally 12. (12 having also waged an undeclared war against us
for a decade.)
And another outside agent
(Russia) is sending troops to work with 12 to support 6 against gangs 8, 10, 2,
3, and 5 (all of whom are fighting each other), even though it might accidently
engage US troops and begin a wider war in the process.
I have used gangs and pie shaped
territorial wedges numbered like the face of a clock because it is less
confusing than writing out the names of the participants. But obviously 6 represents Syria, 8 is
Turkey, 10 the Kurds, 12 Iran, 2 Iraq, 3 ISIS and 5 Al Qaeda. Each is fighting some or all of the others,
and each has ethnic and religious enemies from the others mixed into their
territorial slice. If this sounds crazy,
it is.
In fact it is even crazier than
it sounds, because the violence is beyond description. Fathers are beaten to
death before their families. Children are crucified and buried alive. Women are
stripped and sold in slave markets. Recently the 5’s caught four men from 12
fighting for 2. They hung them upside down and burned them alive, claiming this
is what 12 and 2 (our ally) had recently done to captives of their own. Who knows – maybe so. And of course, 6 is
still dropping massive nail bombs onto civilian neighborhoods in order to
cleanse their territory and create mass refugee movements. (It’s working.) The US is flying air attacks
from 8 against 3 in support of 10, while 8 launches independent attacks against
our ally 10 from the same airfields.
Good grief.
So why not just get the hell out
and let them eat each other? Great
question.
Well first, remember that we
started this rock slide by failing to ensure stability when we replaced Saddam,
and then compounded the problem by overthrowing more strongmen, thereby
creating anarchy that supported our values even less. (Honestly, can’t anybody here play this
game?)
Second, we have committed to
support some people (like 10, the Kurds) who fought with us and will be
massacred if we abandon them.
Third, the instability is
already spreading, as radicals and fanatics and disaffected minorities in other
countries see the possibility of overthrowing their rulers. Now we are back to looking at threats to American
survival interests (oil) across the Mideast.
And finally, the most radical
and most threatening participants in all the gangs have attracted tens of
thousands to their cause. If they are victorious, their attraction will grow,
and their graduates will return to their homes (to include in the US) with new
skills, ready to put them to use. We need to break the cycle of success there
in order to reduce the danger of metastasis.
Is there a simple lesson from all
this? Yes. If you combine enough bad ideas from
academicians, politicians, diplomats and the military, you can break Humpty
Dumpty in a way that can’t be put back together again. Perhaps we should be
asking whose fingerprints are all over the shattered glass. We won’t have to look far.
No comments:
Post a Comment