The second area to watch for homeland
security news in 2013 is in budgets. Many people assume that DHS and DOD
budgets are about the same. In fact the DHS budget is roughly $59 billion,
while the DOD budget is roughly $525 billion. Thus the US spends about $9 on
DOD for each $1 spent on DHS. (At the height of the two wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan, the ratio was about 15:1.)
About $39 billion of the DHS money is available for “discretionary
spending.” The rest is required for accounts like retirement . The money goes to fund the following DHS
agencies and programs:
- Customs and Border Protection (CBP); Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE); the Transportation Security Administration (TSA);Coast Guard (USCG); Secret Service (USSS); the National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD), which includes Infrastructure Protection and Information Security (IPIS) and the Federal Protective Service (FPS); the Office of Health Affairs (OHA); the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA); United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS); the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC); the Science and Technology directorate (S&T); the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO); departmental management, Analysis and Operations (A&O), and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG).
It also provides a variety of
grants, and here is where we can expect one significant change in 2013. When DHS was envisioned in 2002, President
Bush said he foresaw homeland security spending of about $100 billion a year
(in 2002 dollars). Expenditures would be about 1/3 by the federal government, 1/3 by state and
local government, and 1/3 by private industry. If you draw a line between this
original estimate and the 2013 budget, you will see that after adjusting for
cost increases, the 2013 federal government expenditure is a bit high but not
far off the mark set in 2002. State and local spending, however, do not come
close to the 2002 estimate. Homeland security spending by private industry
hardly registers at all. Much of the spending that does take place at the state
and local level is funded by DHS through (federal) grants. And here’s the rub.
A good share of state and local programs and equipment purchased with DHS grants
requires later DHS grants to sustain operations. (This includes personnel
positions in many areas.)
This matters because DHS grants are
in decline, and will no doubt be reduced again in response to further budget
pressures in Washington, DC. For example, most DHS grant funding goes through
the states, but the Urban Area Security Initiative passes funding directly to metropolitan
areas, as does the Metropolitan Medical Response System. Both of these programs are
under significant budget pressure, as is funding for the Citizens Corps. This
umbrella for local programs (like Citizens Emergency Response Teams – or CERT) speeds
immediate local response to emergencies.
As state and local governments and private industry are unlikely to make
up this reduced funding – and in fact are likely to reduce the low level of
funding they themselves already provide – homeland security capabilities
outside of federal agencies are likely to decline in 2013. This is a shame, since
many of these grant programs are both efficient and effective, especially at
the local level.
Great insight! It's hard to hear, but I'm glad you're saying it. It seems to be your role to be the one who says what must be said.
ReplyDelete